Based on 22 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📈
Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds added BOLT than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🔻
Below peak — only 58% of 3.0Y high
58% of all-time peak
Only 22 funds hold BOLT today versus a peak of 38 funds at 2023 Q2 — just 58% of the maximum. Low institutional ownership can mean the stock is out of favor, but it also means there's a large pool of potential buyers if sentiment turns.
📉
Outflows — 21% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
6 fewer hedge funds hold BOLT compared to a year ago (-21% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🟢
More buyers than sellers — 61% buying
11 buying7 selling
Last quarter: 11 funds were net buyers (5 opened a brand new position + 6 added to an existing one). Only 7 were sellers (3 trimmed + 4 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~5 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 2 → 4 → 3 → 5. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
50% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 50% conviction (2yr+)
■ 23% medium
■ 27% new
11 out of 22 hedge funds have held BOLT for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎
Buying through price weakness — shares +2%, value -24%
Last quarter: funds added +2% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -24%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~5 new funds/quarter
2 → 2 → 4 → 3 → 5 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 2 → 4 → 3 → 5. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 59% veterans vs 27% newcomers
■ 59% veterans
■ 14% 1-2yr
■ 27% new
Entry-cohort mix of 22 holders: 13 (59%) are 2+ year veterans, 3 entered 1–2 years ago, and 6 (27%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
📋
Smaller funds dominant — 9% AUM from top-100
9% from top-100 AUM funds
6 of 22 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 9% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
Exit risk score 1.6/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.