Based on 37 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their BHM positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
📊
High ownership — 73% of 3.0Y peak
73% of all-time peak
37 funds currently hold this stock — 73% of the 3.0-year high of 51 funds (reached 2023 Q2). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
〰️
Stable — ownership unchanged year-over-year
fund count last 6Q
The number of hedge funds holding BHM is almost the same as a year ago (-1 funds, -3% change). No significant rush to buy or sell — institutional backing is holding steady.
🟠
More sellers than buyers — 45% buying
13 buying16 selling
Last quarter: 16 funds reduced or exited vs 13 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~5 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 2 → 1 → 5 → 5. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
65% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 65% conviction (2yr+)
■ 14% medium
■ 22% new
24 out of 37 hedge funds have held BHM for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~5 new funds/quarter
0 → 2 → 1 → 5 → 5 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 2 → 1 → 5 → 5. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 68% veterans vs 22% newcomers
■ 68% veterans
■ 11% 1-2yr
■ 22% new
Entry-cohort mix of 37 holders: 25 (68%) are 2+ year veterans, 4 entered 1–2 years ago, and 8 (22%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
✅
Strong quality — 22% AUM from major funds
22% from top-100 AUM funds
9 of 36 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 22% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.
Exit risk score 2.5/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.