Based on 69 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📈
Buying streak — 4 quarters in a row
For 4 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added AMZA than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️
At the ownership peak (100% of max)
100% of all-time peak
69 hedge funds hold AMZA right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
📶
Steady growth — +19% more funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
+11 new funds entered over the past year (+19% YoY). Gradual, steady growth in institutional ownership is generally a healthy signal — not a speculative rush, but consistent conviction.
🟡
Slight buying edge — 59% buying
38 buying26 selling
Last quarter: 38 funds bought or added vs 26 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~15 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 9 → 12 → 14 → 15. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
51% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 51% conviction (2yr+)
■ 29% medium
■ 20% new
35 out of 69 hedge funds have held AMZA for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
📈
Growing discovery — still being found
10 → 9 → 12 → 14 → 15 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 9 → 12 → 14 → 15. A growing number of institutions are discovering AMZA each quarter. The narrative is still spreading — leaving room for ongoing capital accumulation.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 55% veterans vs 28% newcomers
■ 55% veterans
■ 17% 1-2yr
■ 28% new
Entry-cohort mix of 71 holders: 39 (55%) are 2+ year veterans, 12 entered 1–2 years ago, and 20 (28%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
📋
Smaller funds dominant — 18% AUM from top-100
18% from top-100 AUM funds
9 of 69 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 18% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
Exit risk score 3.8/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.