Based on 11 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their AMADY positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
🔻
Below peak — only 61% of 3.0Y high
61% of all-time peak
Only 11 funds hold AMADY today versus a peak of 18 funds at 2025 Q4 — just 61% of the maximum. Low institutional ownership can mean the stock is out of favor, but it also means there's a large pool of potential buyers if sentiment turns.
〰️
Stable — ownership unchanged year-over-year
fund count last 6Q
The number of hedge funds holding AMADY is almost the same as a year ago (+0 funds, +0% change). No significant rush to buy or sell — institutional backing is holding steady.
🔴
Heavy selling pressure — only 28% buying
5 buying13 selling
Last quarter: 13 funds sold vs only 5 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.
⚠️
Fewer new buyers each quarter (-6 vs last Q)
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 2 → 1 → 7 → 1. Each quarter fewer new institutions are entering. This usually means most funds that wanted in are already in — the stock is well-known but the pool of potential new buyers is shrinking.
📌
Mixed — 36% long-term, 27% new
■ 36% conviction (2yr+)
■ 36% medium
■ 27% new
Of the 11 current holders: 4 (36%) held >2 years, 4 held 1–2 years, and 3 entered in the last year. A mixed base — the stock has long-term believers but also recent buyers who haven't been tested by a downturn yet.
💎
Buying through price weakness — shares -26%, value -44%
Last quarter: funds added -26% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -44%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~1 new funds/quarter
3 → 2 → 1 → 7 → 1 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 2 → 1 → 7 → 1. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
📊
Mixed cohorts — 36% veterans, 36% new entrants
■ 36% veterans
■ 27% 1-2yr
■ 36% new
Of 11 current holders: 4 (36%) held 2+ years, 3 held 1–2 years, 4 (36%) entered in the past year. Balanced distribution — some institutional memory, some recent momentum buyers.
✅
Strong quality — 25% AUM from major funds
25% from top-100 AUM funds
2 of 11 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 25% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.
Exit risk score 3.3/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.