Live Analyst Rating Changes 1525 upgrades, downgrades & price-target moves · freshest Wall Street data, updated daily View live feed →
Analyst Tracker/Firms/Jefferies
JEF

Jefferies

128 tracked analysts · 2248 measured calls · pooled track record
54%
Pooled Success Rate
+6.7%
Avg Return / Call
-6.5%
vs S&P 500
128
Analysts Tracked

These figures pool every individual call made by Jefferies's analysts into a single sample — so a prolific analyst carries more weight than a low-volume one, exactly in proportion to the evidence available. All metrics are computed independently by 13Foresight from historical prices.

Jefferies — Analyst Roster & Track Records 128 analysts · top 6 Pro-only
Analyst Our Rank Stars Success Avg Return vs S&P Calls
Pro analyst
Pro analyst
Pro analyst
Pro analyst
Pro analyst
Pro analyst
Charles Brennan #192 ★★★★★ 100% +40.9% +22.9% 4
Sho Fukuhara #196 ★★★★★ 88% +34.3% +10.0% 8
Blayne Curtis #210 ★★★★★ 69% +15.2% +8.6% 45
David Chiaverini #213 ★★★★★ 80% +14.8% -2.8% 74
Kevin Garrigan #238 ★★★★★ 70% +28.8% +15.0% 20
Sheila Kahyaoglu #257 ★★★★★ 65% +7.1% +1.0% 60
Blake Anderson #342 ★★★★ 73% +9.4% +3.0% 11
John Aiken #443 ★★★★ 100% +21.4% +1.5% 3
Faisal Khurshid #466 ★★★★ 54% +34.8% +24.0% 35
James Wheatcroft #484 ★★★★ 67% +15.4% +18.7% 3
Pedro Baptista #514 ★★★★ 75% +22.4% +8.1% 4
Greg Konrad #520 ★★★★ 62% +15.1% +5.7% 8
Stephen Volkmann #544 ★★★★ 71% +12.9% -2.2% 55
Fahad Tariq #555 ★★★★ 67% +28.2% +16.6% 3
Benjamin Jackson CFA #611 ★★★★ 67% +27.9% +13.1% 3
Ed Mundy #626 ★★★★ 75% +12.3% -7.4% 8
Chris LaFemina #647 ★★★★ 60% +12.6% +1.0% 20
Joseph Dickerson #664 ★★★★ 67% +15.0% -0.3% 6
Philip Kett #724 ★★★★ 67% +41.4% -0.4% 3
Bret Jordan #746 ★★★★ 67% +15.4% -6.5% 24
Julien Dumoulin Smith #782 ★★★ 63% +7.5% -4.0% 92
Glynis Johnson #786 ★★★ 67% +10.7% -4.7% 3
Michael Toomey #788 ★★★ 67% +17.8% -2.4% 3
Michael Sarcone #817 ★★★ 67% +17.6% +1.4% 9
Matthew Stanton, CFA #850 ★★★ 67% +5.4% -3.3% 6
Daniel Fannon #854 ★★★ 63% +12.3% -4.9% 41
Saree Boroditsky #871 ★★★ 57% +13.4% -0.4% 30
Corey Tarlowe #893 ★★★ 57% +3.8% -2.4% 30
Mark Wilson #900 ★★★ 50% +8.9% +1.2% 8
Scott Marks CFA #902 ★★★ 57% -0.3% -4.3% 23
Zachary Weiner #930 ★★★ 62% +5.2% -6.6% 8
Paul Zimbardo CFA #978 ★★★ 58% +4.8% -8.0% 12
Amy Li #983 ★★★ 50% +114.4% +100.1% 4
Philippe Houchois #1011 ★★★ 43% +6.4% +0.4% 7
Joe Dickstein #1047 ★★★ 61% +2.3% -8.7% 18
John Edelman CFA #1069 ★★★ 50% +3.6% -7.8% 4
Andy Barish #1123 ★★★ 62% +3.2% -6.3% 37
Dushyant Ailani #1156 ★★★ 43% +36.3% +23.4% 14
Edison Lee #1170 ★★★ 50% -1.4% -11.7% 6
Jonathan Petersen #1222 ★★★ 56% +6.0% -7.0% 55
Emma Schwartz #1233 ★★★ 33% -5.7% -12.3% 3
Michael Leuchten #1238 ★★★ 50% -3.4% -15.2% 4
Xiaoyi Lei #1244 ★★★ 33% +1.7% -13.9% 3
Atul Goyal #1248 ★★★ 40% +15.4% -5.2% 5
Jonathan Matuszewski #1283 ★★★ 47% +1.3% -4.6% 19
James Grzinic #1287 ★★★ 67% +4.9% -24.5% 9
Joseph Gallo #1324 ★★★ 48% +3.0% -3.3% 23
Linda Tsai #1337 ★★★ 58% +4.5% -12.9% 24
Andrew Tsai #1386 ★★★ 52% +8.8% -1.7% 27
Alejandro Demichelis #1396 ★★★ 50% +8.1% -8.0% 16
Laurence Alexander #1453 ★★★ 56% +9.8% -6.1% 66
Farzin Haque #1477 ★★★ 43% +8.4% -5.2% 7
Daniel Rizzo #1481 ★★★ 45% +6.0% -10.1% 11
John Hecht #1575 ★★★ 62% +10.2% -5.2% 50
Keith Devas #1671 ★★★ 25% -19.0% -25.1% 4
Raj Denhoy #1699 ★★★ 53% +2.0% -11.0% 30
David Hayes #1780 ★★★ 33% -2.6% -16.9% 9
Alexander Slagle #1792 ★★★ 45% +3.0% -10.2% 20
Anne Ling #1794 ★★★ 0% -19.7% -38.4% 3
David Windley #1859 ★★ 59% +8.2% -5.3% 27
Stephanie Moore #1930 ★★ 49% -2.9% -11.0% 55
Roger Song #1945 ★★ 43% +29.0% +14.4% 42
Randal Konik #1957 ★★ 49% +5.9% -5.7% 70
Clara Dong #1976 ★★ 38% +14.2% +4.9% 13
Sydney Wagner #2016 ★★ 25% -13.5% -21.5% 8
Philip Ng #2044 ★★ 44% +0.2% -13.2% 34
Young Li #2046 ★★ 36% -5.7% -24.9% 11
Johnson Wan #2065 ★★ 29% -18.3% -32.6% 7
James Heaney CFA #2090 ★★ 33% -4.9% -13.1% 21
Sam Burwell #2100 ★★ 33% -9.1% -28.1% 9
Andrew Andersen #2103 ★★ 50% -3.5% -22.4% 30
Lloyd Byrne #2105 ★★ 33% +2.0% -5.8% 42
Brian Tanquilut #2141 ★★ 52% -2.1% -16.9% 46
Matthew Taylor #2145 ★★ 44% +1.8% -12.9% 34
Alexander Wright #2187 ★★ 20% -5.4% -29.2% 10
John Colantuoni #2218 ★★ 37% -6.3% -15.8% 27
Matthew Hurwit #2233 ★★ 22% -18.4% -31.2% 9
Surinder Thind #2336 47% -5.8% -19.9% 43
Samad Samana #2337 37% -3.1% -12.8% 35
Kaumil Gajrawala #2341 49% -7.0% -21.8% 39
Dennis Ding #2376 48% -2.8% -15.9% 25
Trevor Williams #2387 35% -14.3% -29.4% 17
Brent Thill #2408 44% -5.4% -14.5% 85
Maury Raycroft #2480 36% +4.2% -10.3% 44
Tycho Peterson #2519 33% -9.6% -18.0% 54
Thomas Chong #2528 28% -8.6% -25.4% 40
Kelly Shi #2545 36% -4.5% -20.2% 45
Simon LeChipre 100% +9.8% -0.7% 2
Hannes Leitner 100% +10.4% -28.3% 1
Martin Comtesse 0
Hiroko Sato 0
Mitch Ryan 0
Shuhang Jiang 0
Andrei Andon Ionita 50% -9.6% -24.2% 2
Stephen Barker 0
David Stanton 0% -34.5% -48.7% 2
John Dunigan 0% -5.4% -16.0% 2
Thanh Ha Pham 100% +75.2% +40.2% 1
Thomas Mills 0
Constantin Hesse 50% +8.2% -12.8% 2
Inigo Vega 0% -11.9% -30.8% 2
Graham Hunt 0
Akshat Agarwal 50% +1.6% -21.7% 2
Miruna Chirea 0
Amin Makarem 50% +12.7% +3.8% 2
Pierre-Emmanuel Clouard 0
Martinien Rula 100% +4.5% +4.1% 1
Chloe Lemarie 100% +36.2% +14.6% 2
Cole Hathorn 100% +77.8% +46.2% 2
Andrew Douglas 0% -17.0% -24.2% 2
Shunsuke Kuriyama 0
Lucas Ferhani 100% +30.4% +0.2% 1
Antonio Pedro Cardoso 50% +3.8% -4.8% 2
Allen Wells 100% +264.2% +200.2% 1
Arturo Murua 0
Julien Dormois 50% +0.6% -14.4% 2
Masahiro Nakanomyo 100% +10.3% -6.2% 1
Zoey Zong 0% -4.6% -2.8% 1
Tommaso Castello 0% -1.0% -6.9% 1
Michael Aspinall 100% +11.2% +4.5% 1
Kylie Cohu 0% -14.5% -19.7% 2
Vanessa Jeffriess 0% +0.0% -0.3% 1
🔒 The 6 highest-rated analysts at Jefferies are Pro-only — this is where the real edge is. Reveal top 6

🔓 What 13Foresight Pro unlocks here

The 6 top-ranked analysts at Jefferies, the firm's full 3- and 5-year track record, and firm-vs-firm rankings across Wall Street. Everything below the top 6, plus 1- and 2-year history, stays free — Pro is what keeps this independent research running and the servers paid for.

Upgrade to Pro

Disclaimer: Firm-level performance is calculated independently by 13Foresight by pooling the historical calls of analysts associated with this firm, measured against market prices. It may be incomplete or delayed, is for research purposes only, and is not investment advice.